Published on: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:13:03 GMT
Original Story: Exclusive | Trump tells Post why he said ‘I love the inflation’ — and predicts 4.2% rate will be Iran war peak – New York Post

Economic Genius Declares ‘I Love Inflation!’

Alright, folks, gather ’round, because another day, another head-scratcher from the former guy. Just when you thought you’d heard it all – from covfefe to injecting bleach – he’s now decided that inflation, that pesky little thing eating away at our paltry 401ks and making groceries cost more than a small car payment, is actually… a good thing? Or, more specifically, he “loves” it. Yeah, you heard that right. Not loves a good steak, or loves a gold-plated toilet, but inflation. Because, apparently, in the grand, chaotic chess game that is his mind, it’s all part of some master strategy.

The New York Post, bless their hearts, got the exclusive. Trump, ever the wordsmith, clarified his earlier declaration of affection for rising prices, stating that he loves inflation because it “shows how bad things are under Biden.” He then, with the casual confidence of someone predicting the weather based on a feeling in their knee, proclaimed that the current 4.2% inflation rate is going to be the “Iran war peak.” Because, you know, we’re totally in an Iran war. And inflation rates have specific “war peaks.” It’s all very scientific, obviously. Or maybe it’s just another Tuesday.

The Ever-Shifting Sands of Economic Wisdom

Let’s just take a moment, shall we, to appreciate the sheer, unadulterated flexibility of this man’s economic philosophy. It’s like watching a gymnast perform a triple-somersault without a mat, only the gymnast is wearing a very expensive suit and shouting about how great his landing was, even as he’s flat on his face. For years, particularly during his own tenure in the Oval Office, the narrative was diametrically opposed. Remember the halcyon days of 2018-2019? The tweets practically wrote themselves. Every other day, it was a triumphant announcement about the “greatest economy ever,” boasting about low unemployment, soaring stock markets, and, crucially, low inflation. He took credit for it. He owned it. He practically wallpapered the White House with charts showing minimal price increases, implying it was a direct result of his Midas touch.

When Low Inflation Was a Virtue

Back then, low inflation wasn’t just a benign economic indicator; it was a badge of honor, a testament to his administration’s brilliance. “NO INFLATION!” he’d declare, often in all caps, as if slaying an economic dragon. The idea that inflation was something to be “loved” would have been, well, anathema. It would have been proof of economic mismanagement, a clear failure. Fast forward a few years, and now, like a magician pulling a rabbit from a hat, inflation is suddenly a cherished ally, a strategic asset in the political arena. The mental gymnastics required to pivot from “low inflation is my achievement” to “I love inflation because it highlights my opponent’s failures” are truly Olympian. My corporate burnout brain can barely keep up, and I’ve seen some truly impressive PowerPoint pivots in my day.

Deconstructing “I Love Inflation” (The Political Version)

So, what does it actually mean when a prominent political figure declares their love for something that objectively makes life harder for most people? It’s not about genuine affection, obviously. It’s about weaponization. Inflation, in this context, isn’t an economic phenomenon; it’s a cudgel. It’s a talking point. It’s the latest shiny object to distract from… well, from pretty much everything else. By saying “I love inflation,” he’s not endorsing higher prices for your groceries or gas; he’s endorsing the political utility of those higher prices. It’s a calculated (or perhaps just instinctual) move to frame the current economic landscape as an unmitigated disaster, thereby bolstering his own “make America great again” narrative.

The irony, of course, is that inflation is a complex beast, influenced by a myriad of global factors, supply chain disruptions (hello, pandemic!), energy costs, and fiscal policies. To boil it down to a simple “Biden bad” soundbite, while politically expedient, is a gross oversimplification. But hey, nuance is for nerds and economists who actually read textbooks, not for politicians looking to rally the troops with catchy, if nonsensical, slogans.

The Curious Case of the “Iran War Peak”

And then there’s the pièce de résistance: the “Iran war peak.” Now, unless I missed a few headlines while doomscrolling through LinkedIn, I’m fairly certain we’re not currently embroiled in a full-scale, declared war with Iran that would typically send shockwaves through global oil markets and contribute to a specific “war peak” in inflation. Are we talking about proxy conflicts? Geopolitical tensions? Or is this just another one of those things that sounds vaguely authoritative if you say it with enough conviction?

It’s a classic move: invent a crisis, attribute a seemingly scientific-sounding economic effect to it, and then declare victory by predicting its eventual (and presumably temporary) end. It’s like saying, “I love the rain, because it shows how bad the drought was, and I predict this will be the ‘Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs’ peak.” It sounds important, but it’s utterly devoid of empirical basis. Actual economists, the ones who spend their lives looking at data and models, probably just sigh and reach for another espresso when they hear this kind of thing. My burnout self just wants a nap.

What This Means for Your Wallet (and Your Sanity)

For the average American, inflation isn’t something to be loved. It’s a very real, very tangible threat to financial stability. It means your paycheck doesn’t stretch as far, your savings erode, and the dream of homeownership recedes further into the hazy distance. It’s the reason you now stare at the grocery bill with the same bewildered expression you reserve for your monthly student loan statement. So, when someone with immense political power says they “love” it, it’s not just a gaffe; it’s a stark reminder of how divorced political rhetoric can be from the lived experiences of everyday people.

It also highlights the continued erosion of factual discourse. When economic realities can be rebranded and recontextualized on a whim, based purely on political expediency, it makes it incredibly difficult for citizens to make informed decisions. It feeds into the cycle of ‘truth vs. reality’ that we spend so much time dissecting here at The Centerpoint Daily. Is he a master strategist playing 4D chess, or is he just saying whatever sounds good in the moment to get a rise out of people? My money’s on the latter, with a side of opportunistic chaos. Because, let’s be real, chaos is a ladder.