Published on: Sun, 08 Mar 2026 10:00:04 GMTOriginal Story: Longtime Trump critic reveals why she thinks his Iran actions are wrong, warns it’s a ‘much bigger war’ – Fox News “`html Here We Go Again: Trump and the Middle East Alright, buckle up, buttercups. We’ve got another geopolitical head-scratcher coming at us courtesy of the 45th President. This time, it involves Iran, a Fox News talking head, and a whole lot of potential for things to go sideways. The headline? Apparently, Trump’s actions regarding Iran are now being questioned by even his *former* critics. Color me shocked. NOT. This latest development, as reported by Fox News (because, of course, it is), centers around a prominent, previously anti-Trump voice expressing concerns that his current approach to Iran could escalate into a “much bigger war.” You know, the kind of war that keeps us all glued to our doomscrolling apps and makes us question the sanity of global politics. Good times. The Iran Nuclear Deal: A Blast From the Past Let’s rewind the clock a bit, shall we? Remember the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)? Trump, upon entering office, made it his personal mission to rip it to shreds. He argued it was the worst deal ever negotiated (a phrase he seemed to use for just about everything that wasn’t named “Trump”). In 2018, he officially withdrew the United States from the agreement, despite the protestations of, well, pretty much everyone else involved, including our European allies. He claimed the deal didn’t go far enough in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons and that it was a giveaway to a regime that sponsors terrorism. His move was hailed by some as a bold stance against a dangerous adversary. But, others (myself included) predicted it would destabilize the region and potentially pave the way for Iran to actually *develop* nuclear weapons, now unencumbered by the JCPOA’s restrictions. Now *that* was a strategic masterpiece. But Wait, There’s More Contradiction! Here’s where things get extra spicy. Trump, throughout his presidency, campaigned on a platform of ending “endless wars” in the Middle East. Remember that? He promised to bring our troops home, to disengage from costly and protracted conflicts that drained American resources and lives. Pulling out of the Iran deal was, ostensibly, part of that strategy. He claimed that by applying “maximum pressure” through sanctions, he could force Iran back to the negotiating table and secure a “better deal.” But guess what? That “better deal” never materialized. Instead, Iran ramped up its nuclear program, tensions in the region escalated, and we found ourselves teetering on the brink of conflict more than once. So, while Trump talked about ending wars, his actions arguably increased the risk of one. Back in 2019, the drone strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani nearly ignited a full-blown war. Good times, good times. Déjà Vu All Over Again So, what’s different now? Why is this “longtime Trump critic” suddenly sounding the alarm? Probably because they’re finally realizing that Trump’s “strategy” (and I use that term loosely) has been a colossal failure. Sanctions haven’t worked. Diplomacy is non-existent. And the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran looms larger than ever. The worry, of course, is that Trump, in his second act, might double down on his previous policies. He could intensify sanctions, increase military deployments, or even launch a preemptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Any of these actions could trigger a wider conflict, drawing in regional powers and potentially even the United States. And that, my friends, would be a “much bigger war” indeed. The Art of the (Failed) Deal The irony is thicker than a milkshake at this point. Trump, the self-proclaimed master negotiator, has managed to turn a bad situation into a potentially catastrophic one. His insistence on tearing up the Iran deal, his unwavering belief in the power of sanctions, and his penchant for impulsive decision-making have all contributed to the current mess. And now, as the possibility of a wider conflict looms, even his former critics are starting to see the writing on the wall. It’s a classic case of “I told you so,” but with the added bonus of potentially global consequences. Snarky Takeaway So, here’s the deal: Trump’s Iran policy has been a masterclass in how *not* to conduct foreign policy. He promised to end wars, but his actions have only increased the risk of one. He claimed to be a brilliant negotiator, but he’s failed to secure a better deal. And now, as we stand on the precipice of a potential conflict, we’re left to wonder if anyone is actually in charge. Maybe we should just tweet at him and see what happens. What could possibly go wrong? “` Post navigation Trump: Now the Good Neighbor with Missiles?