Published on: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:23:49 GMTOriginal Story: Would Trump’s Threatened Attacks on Iran’s Infrastructure Be a War Crime? – Time Magazine “`html Trump’s “Infrastructure Week” Goes International (and Illegal?) Oh, here we go again. Our tangerine-tinted former (and potentially future – *shudders*) president, Donald J. Trump, is back to his old tricks: casually musing about potential war crimes like they’re just another Tuesday morning brainstorming session. This time, he’s floated the idea of attacking Iran’s infrastructure, specifically their oil refineries. Because, you know, nothing says “peaceful negotiation” like blowing up someone’s means of, well, existing. According to that bastion of journalistic integrity, *Time Magazine* (yes, I rolled my eyes typing that), legal eagles are already sharpening their talons over whether such an attack would constitute a war crime. Spoiler alert: it probably would. Targeting civilian infrastructure is generally frowned upon in international law, unless you can convincingly argue that it’s a legitimate military target. And even then, you’d better have a *really* good lawyer. Remember “Bomb the Shit Out of Them?” We Do. The hypocrisy, of course, is thicker than a MAGA rally crowd. Let’s not forget Trump’s previous pronouncements on, shall we say, *robust* military action. Remember back in 2015, when he was just a wee little candidate, and he declared he would “bomb the shit out of” ISIS-controlled oil facilities? The argument then, and likely now, would be that these facilities fund terrorist activities. But the line between “legitimate military target” and “economic warfare that harms civilians” is blurry at best, and intentionally obscured at worst. Double Standards and International Law: A Trump Special Trump’s approach to international law has always been… let’s call it “flexible.” He’s never been one for sticking to pesky things like treaties and conventions, especially when they get in the way of, you know, “winning.” This latest Iran pronouncement is just another example of his “America First” philosophy taken to its logical, and frankly terrifying, conclusion: international law is only relevant when it suits us. The Geneva Conventions: More Like Geneva *Suggestions*, Right? The Geneva Conventions, those quaint little agreements about the rules of war? Yeah, Trump probably sees them as more of a suggestion box. The idea that there are limits to what you can do in wartime seems utterly foreign to a man who once bragged about grabbing women “by the pussy.” (Still not over that, by the way.) And let’s not forget the countless times his administration was accused of violating international norms, from separating families at the border to withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal. This isn’t just a one-off gaffe; it’s a pattern. A pattern of disregarding international law whenever it conflicts with his own agenda. The “Art of the Deal” or the “Art of the War Crime?” Trump fancies himself a master negotiator, the ultimate dealmaker. But his idea of negotiation seems to involve threatening violence and then expecting the other side to just cave. It’s the same tactic he used in business, and now he wants to apply it to international relations. The problem is, international relations are a bit more complicated than buying a golf course. You can’t just strong-arm your way to a favorable outcome without consequences. Consequences? What Consequences? Ah, yes, consequences. That’s where things get tricky. Will Trump actually follow through on his threat to attack Iran’s infrastructure? Who knows? He’s notoriously unpredictable. But even the threat itself has consequences. It destabilizes the region, it undermines international law, and it makes the United States look like a rogue nation. And for what? To score political points with his base? To distract from his legal troubles? Who knows? The sad truth is, this is just another day in the Trump era. Another day of reckless rhetoric, disregard for international norms, and potential war crimes. And we’re all just sitting here, watching it unfold, wondering when the adults are going to come back and take charge. Snarky Takeaway So, to recap: Trump is threatening to commit potential war crimes, again, conveniently forgetting his prior, equally questionable, stances. The world is bracing for impact. And I’m reaching for another bottle of wine. Because frankly, what else can you do? Cheers to the impending apocalypse, folks! “` Post navigation Trump Tests NATO Loyalty, Again. Sigh. Trump Demands Fealty: Shocked, I’m Not!